|
|
|
THE STUMBLING BLOCK PREVENTING WIDESPREAD DEPLOYMENT OF
DVD
The drive to establish the digital versatile disk product
is intense because of the market potential involved. According to Philips
Electronics NV of Eindhoven, There are 600 million CD audio and CD ROM
drives installed worldwide.
In addition, 10 billion compact discs have been stamped to play on these
units. With each user a potential buyer of digital versatile disk players
and discs, the market is huge and untapped. But, there is one major
obstacle blocking this gold rush from happening: how can copyright owners
protect their content published on DVD.
The current stalemate began in late March, with Jack Valenti, president
of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and Gary Shapiro,
president of the Consumer Electronics Manufacturers Association (CEMA).
They are submitting to the U.S. Congress proposed legislation mandating
digital versatile disk players include a copy protection scheme in their
equipment with the recommendation, for copy protection.
One reason for the extra caution is that DVD will connect to computers
that have the ability to copy and reproduce the content on other storage
media or transmit over networks. Audio compact discs are already living
with this reality, but the fact seems lost on the MPAA and CEMA.
“ The proposal specifies a technical reference document, which
sets forth the specific standards and specifications for encoding linear
motion pictures with copy control information,” Philip V.W. Dodds,
president of the Interactive Multimedia Association explains. “All
linear movie player devices, which are defined in the proposed bill,
are mandated to conform with this specification.”
The measure enables content owners to limit reproduction of pay-per-view,
video-on-demand, pay broadcast, or pre-recorded material. However, television
and cable broadcasters are exempted. “The draft bill is clearly
aimed at protecting the period immediately following the initial release
of movies, or those products that have not yet been released to television,”
Dodds contends.
Needless to say, the computer industry is balking at the prospect of
this proposed legislation becoming law. After reviewing the draft proposal,
the ad-hoc Technical Working Group composed of eleven major computer
manufacturers came to the following conclusion: “the TWG representatives
have unanimously concluded that the current proposal is not acceptable.”
Dodds says that the TWG cited the computer’s inability to track
source/destination information of data during its transfer; performance
degradation; non-standard data block size; unnecessary complexity to
system design; inability to access the vertical blanking interval (for
analog sources); requirement to support the standard even if no DVD
device were attached to the PC; and the requirement that all data streams
would have to be continually monitored for the possible inclusion of
copy protection information.
Dodds concludes it is infeasible for the computer industry to comply
with the proposal, even if manufacturers wanted.
The AP-Dow Jones News Services for July 3, 1996, cited other stumbling
blocks to the DVD included fees for companies that invented the discs
and a method of coding the CDs so manufacturers can control which discs
can be played on machines sold in specific regions of the world.
<BACK
|
|
|